Ainius Sabaliauskas vs Petr Hajek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Sabaliauskas vs P. Hajek

Ainius Sabaliauskas
LTU
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
28
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
895
0
Best Rank
759
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Petr Hajek
CZE
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
28
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
895
0
Best Rank
759
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Sabaliauskas 1 - 0 Hajek
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ainius Sabaliauskas winning 2 and Petr Hajek winning 1. The last match between Ainius Sabaliauskas and Petr Hajek was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 22-03-2022, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Ainius Sabaliauskas getting the victory 5-7 6-3 10-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sabaliauskas | 1 |
| Hajek | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Sharm ElSheikh(03-22-22)
Ainius Sabaliauskas
5
6
10
Petr Hajek
7
3
3
A. Sabaliauskas vs P. Hajek H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.38% (67-66) | Career Total W/L | 53.00% (150-133) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Sabaliauskas vs P. Hajek Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ainius Sabaliauskas has won 40.97% of points on their second serve, while Petr Hajek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ainius Sabaliauskas, in recent form, has won 46.96% of their opponent's second serve points, while Petr Hajek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.56% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ainius Sabaliauskas has saved 50.70% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Petr Hajek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ainius Sabaliauskas has won 63.41% of matches played (W/L 26/15), with Petr Hajek winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ainius Sabaliauskas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 37/29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/6). Petr Hajek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 64/50), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 13/14).
- Player level: In the last year, Ainius Sabaliauskas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/15), where as Petr Hajek has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ainius Sabaliauskas winning 1 times and Petr Hajek being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ainius Sabaliauskas winning 2 and Petr Hajek winning 1.
- The last match between Ainius Sabaliauskas and Petr Hajek was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 22-03-2022, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Ainius Sabaliauskas getting the victory 5-7 6-3 10-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ainius Sabaliauskas has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.78 while Petr Hajek has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ainius Sabaliauskas has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Petr Hajek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ainius Sabaliauskas has converted 28.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Petr Hajek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ainius Sabaliauskas vs Petr Hajek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Sabaliauskas vs P. Hajek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 21 | Games Won | 13 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:23:0 | Average Match Time | 1:23:0 |
| 69% (50/72) | 1st Serve % | 68% (46/68) |
| 76% (38/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (30/46) |
| 50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (11/22) |
| 33% (2/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 40% (27/68) | Return Points Win % | 32% (23/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Sabaliauskas 50%, Hajek 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Sabaliauskas 52%, Hajek 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Sabaliauskas 60%, Hajek 0%.
A. Sabaliauskas Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 4-6 12-10 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 3-6 10-3 | ||
P. Hajek Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 5-7 6-3 10-3 | ||

A. Sabaliauskas vs P. Hajek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.38% (67/66) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.00% (150/133) |
| 51.17% (153/146) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.32% (337/295) |
| 50.85% (1524/1473) | Games Win/Loss | 52.07% (3028/2787) |
| 45.61% (26/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.14% (64/50) |
| 56.06% (37/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.27% (69/63) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.95% (17/20) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 158 | Aces Total | 602 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 111 | Total Double Faults | 637 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 257.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 430.2 |
| 62% (1585/2575) | 1st Serve % | 60% (6068/10058) |
| 71% (1128/1585) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4074/6068) |
| 48% (479/990) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1831/3989) |
| 42% (87/207) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (412/964) |
| 37% (959/2577) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3937/10057) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.77% (66/64) | Futures W/L | 53.00% (150/133) |
| 50% (66/132) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (147/274) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 69% (22/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (30/60) |
| 41% (14/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (32/69) |
| 84% (68/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (150/131) |
| 16% (68/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (150/18) |
| 15% (65/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (133/19) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction04:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction02:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction02:35 AM 15/11/25
Prediction02:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction10:00 AM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
02:35
H2H 0-1
07:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal